Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

PINNED Chrome extension to capture feedback from anywhere
What is the challenge? We work in many applications and Aha! can not build custom integrations for all of them. This makes it very hard to users of those applications to capture feedback and store it all in Aha! ideas. What is the impact? This res...

Integrations

Showing 627

Allow for mapping to-dos in Asana integration

In some cases, Asana sub-tasks are more closely related to Aha! to-dos than requirements. For example, a feature may have to-dos related to marketing tasks which need to sync with Asana. An option to map To-dos to Tasks or Subtask would provide a ...
Austin Merritt about 7 years ago in Asana / Integrations 4 Future consideration

Allow additional Link Types in the 'Links to' field

Within AHA we are mapping Releases -> ADO Release Work Item Master Feature -> ADO Epics Features -> ADO Features. Master Features need to be located in the Release in which they complete. But Features (that contribute to this Master F...
Guest almost 6 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 2 Future consideration

Onedrive for Business Group file libraries

You have implemented OneDrive for Business - however it only allows attaching files from my own document library. I'd like to be able to attach files from other Sharepoint online document libraries - such as those created through 365 Groups and Te...
Guest about 7 years ago in Wanted 4 Future consideration

Fix field population in Aha/Jira integrations to only rely on email address or other specific data

Today when the Aha/Jira integration runs it looks up users in Jira based on email, then failing to find a match it checks first name, then last name. Jira returns results for these and Aha will select the first return. The problem is that if we ha...
Guest about 3 years ago in Jira 1 Future consideration

Project level automation with Jira

Requesting a change to Aha! Jira integration to allow for project level automation. Project level webhooks send payloads differently than system level payloads. If support for project level webhook payloads were added, we could enable multitudes o...
Guest over 2 years ago in Jira 0 Future consideration

Add notification in Slack for Idea Created without having to specify category

What is the challenge? Currently the Slack integration doesn't have a notification type for just Created. It has a notification for Created by category and the user can technically use that and select Anything to get notifications for all ideas cr...
Peter Whisenant 11 months ago in Slack 0 Future consideration

Expose scorecard metrics as integration fields

Currently, scorecard metrics do not appear to be available to integrations. We would like to represent these components in our development system in the interest of transparency to our development teams, but there is no way to get this data across...
Guest almost 6 years ago in Integrations 3 Future consideration

Group Level integration in Aha.

Who would benefit? All the teams who are using aha and Gitlab setup for their SAFe ways of working What impact would it make? Streamlined and logical grouping of features which are created in aha and synced to Gitlab How should it work? Group leve...
Guest almost 2 years ago in Features / Integrations 1 Future consideration

Integration with Siteimprove analytics

What is the challenge? I am a product manager for app and website. I have analytics data dashboards set up in Siteimprove analytics. Right now if I want to link data from these dashboards to product work, I do not have an easy way to do that. What...
Guest 6 months ago in Integrations 0 Future consideration

Allow Aha! user name to populate DevOps board user

When working with multiple users, we need to be able who created what, commented on or changed something. As of right now, the user name (Admin) of who configured the Integration (Azure DevOps Services) is the one that appears on every item in Dev...
Guest over 5 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 3 Future consideration